KC Royals Report Card: Final offseason grades are in
What final grades do the KC Royals deserve for their aggressiveness this winter?
There was no flurry of trades, no key contract extensions, no Fernando Tatis-type blockbuster signings. But the KC Royals, usually boring in the winter, parlayed an uncharacteristic aggressiveness into moves that made them the surprise of this offseason.
Something was definitely different. Typically quiet at first, and as November faded, the Royals burst into action by bringing back pitcher Mike Minor and welcoming center fielder Michael A. Taylor, then cut popular third baseman Maikel Franco just days later. The rapid-fire moves, which would have equaled some previous winters’ entire efforts, signaled change.
Their attention caught by the sudden activity, fans didn’t have to wait long for General Manager Dayton Moore’s next bold move: within a week, he surprisingly signed Cleveland free agent first baseman Carlos Santana to a two-year deal that should finally end the long search for Eric Hosmer’s replacement.
Those deals immediately improved the Royals, but Moore wasn’t done. He re-signed closer Greg Holland, brought back pitchers Ervin Santana and Wade Davis, and grabbed up former Baltimore second baseman Hanser Alberto. And he finally found the lefthanded bat he so badly wanted by pulling the trigger on the big trade that brought Andrew Benintendi to Kansas City.
The Royals had already shown a new side when we gave them good mid-offseason grades a few weeks ago. Now that spring training has ended baseball’s winter, what kind of final marks does the franchise deserve?
For their surprising and refreshing assertiveness, the Royals merit an “A.” Let’s see what their other winter grades look like.
The KC Royals took some risks and made some commitments this winter.
Dayton Moore seems to make finding pitchers to rebuild an annual offseason goal. Seldom does a winter pass without the Royals signing at least one of Moore’s hallmark salvage operations. Sometimes the club abandons those projects and sometimes, as in the cases of Greg Holland and Trevor Rosenthal last season, they pay off handsomely.
Moore was at it again this winter, signing Ervin Santana who, in his only season with the club in 2013, helped the Royals regain relevancy, then Wade Davis, a key component of the 2014-15 World Series teams.
Both are classic Moore moves—inexpensive minor league deals with bigger paydays conditioned on making the Opening Day roster. All Santana and Davis have to do is shake off their poor recent performances—injuries have plagued both and Santana hasn’t pitched well since 2017, and Davis since 2018—and get close to the forms that made them valuable Royals. The risks are low, the potential yields high.
While the Royals don’t absolutely need Santana and Davis, they do require a reliable, everyday outfielder who can hit well and defend Kauffman Stadium’s center field. Free agent signee Michael A. Taylor, the front-runner for the job, has the speed to cover center and steal bases; what makes him riskier than Santana and Davis is his questionable bat (he owns a career .237 average, .291 OBP and 79 wRC+). His failure to measure up to the task will reopen the hole in center field, a gap Whit Merrifield can plug only at the expense of creating another hole in right.
Credit Moore, though, with taking the Santana, Davis and Taylor risks. They could be worth it.
Two short-term commitments to players could be crucial for the KC Royals
To be sure, the Royals needed to add a veteran starting pitcher and a first baseman this winter. The rotation was short a man and no one had been consistent at first since Eric Hosmer.
The club completed its rotation by signing Mike Minor, an established lefty with nine years in the majors, including one as a solid reliever for the Royals in 2017. He struggled with Texas and Oakland in 2020, but won 26 games for the Rangers over the two previous campaigns. He’s a veteran who’ll help develop the club’s young pitchers.
Moore then took care of first base by acquiring Carlos Santana in a move few saw coming. Santana’s career .248 average belies the ability to get on base his .366 career OBP reflects, and he’s hit at least 18 homers in all but two of his 11 big league campaigns. He’s also more than adequate defensively.
Minor and Santana are important additions. Fortunately, the KC Royals chose to secure their services for more than a year—Minor signed a two-year deal with a club option for a third, and Santana signed for two. Committing to even short multi-year obligations means the club is serious about improving.
For risk taking and commitment, give Kansas City a “B+.”
The KC Royals clearly had a plan for this offseason, and stuck to it.
Opinions vary on Dayton Moore. Some will cite the two American League pennants and one World Series title the Royals have won on his watch as proof he’s successful; others will say three winning seasons in the 14 full years he’s run the team prove he’s failed.
The truth lies somewhere in the middle. But beyond dispute is Moore’s unwavering dedication to process and plan—despite harsh criticism for failing to deliver results sooner, refusal to alter his rebuild strategy led to those pennants and Fall Classic trips.
This winter’s Royal aggressiveness wasn’t spontaneous; spontaneity isn’t something the club does well. From the day the 2020 season ended, Moore, with the obvious blessing of principal owner John Sherman, set out to change the team for the best. And as fans grew restless when activity waned in January and Moore’s well-publicized search for an impact lefthanded bat appeared destined for failure, he clearly never deviated from the plan.
Proof of that came in the late-evening trade that brought lefty hitting Andrew Benintendi to Kansas City 10 days ago. His becoming a Royal had been suggested here before, but with the passage of time seemed as unlikely as Moore getting any lefthanded bat.
Moore and his staff quietly stuck to it, though, and late on a Wednesday night consummated the three-way trade that made Benintendi a Royal. Now, thanks to plan and perseverance, Kansas City has a new left fielder, and that bat the club wanted and needed.
For sticking to its plan to improve, the club deserves an “A.”
And give the Royals a final offseason grade of “A-.”
The KC Royals shed their conservative offseason approach this winter. They deserve good grades for it.