Predicting contract terms for Kansas City Royals free agents

The Minnows

These are the players who would be considered small fish in the big free agency pool. Some of them will still get decent contracts in a thin year at their positions. However, others will find their leverage low with little need at their positions. Either way, these guys aren’t likely to earn anything more than one-year contracts this offseason.

Alcides Escobar

A decent second half to the season will see his dollar amount likely increase. But there’s almost no situation where Escobar signs for more than one year. The Kansas City Royals could look to bring him back depending on how things go elsewhere. The other team that would make the most sense would be the Padres.

Verdict: one-year, $6 million contract

Trevor Cahill

There were few bigger deadline busts in MLB than Trevor Cahill. (Although, Brandon Maurer would be in the discussion.) That being said, someone will find use for him next year. He could be a steal, as Matt Kelly of MLB.com included Cahill in a list of possible bounce-back candidates in the mold of Charlie Morton this past season.

Verdict: one-year, $3 million contract

Melky Cabrera

Versatility and leadership will see Melky Cabrera assuredly employed in 2018. He performed well enough last season, although his numbers after the trade were disappointing. His defense isn’t good enough to see him play in the outfield every day, but an American League team could use him at designated hitter frequently.

Verdict: one-year, $7.5 million contract

Peter Moylan

In many ways, Moylan is the most likely player to return to the Kansas City Royals. The bullpen will need all the help it can get next year. Despite being a unique reliever, Moylan won’t have many suitors clamoring for his signature during the winter. He’ll probably be back on a similar (or exactly identical) contract to what he had in 2017.

Verdict: one-year, $1 million contract

Jason Vargas

The 2017 season might have done as much to hurt Jason Vargas as it did help him. He proved he could come back healthy after an elbow injury cost him almost all of the 2015 and 2016 seasons. But he also showed clear signs of fatigue.

Based solely on the first half, Vargas might have been in line for a two-year deal worth upwards of $15-20 million. However, he showed his age — he’ll be 35 when the 2018 season starts — with a horrendous second half. That could take him out of the running for a multi-year contract.

The one positive will be that Vargas’ pitching style isn’t particularly hard on his body. You could also chalk up the fatigue to not having pitched a complete season since 2014. But it should also make teams hesitant to give him more than one guaranteed year.

All that being said, Jon Heyman of FanRag Sports thinks Vargas will reel in $24 million over two years. His “expert” sidekick on the article predicts the left-hander will also sign a two-year deal, but they have him earning considerably less money ($14 million).

It’s looking increasingly likely that Vargas signs his contract — whatever the terms may be — with Baltimore. The Orioles seem to have a lot of interest in him and for good reason. With just two starters, both right-handers, set to return, Buck Showalter needs arms. There are enough teams that could use Vargas to think one would be willing to give him a two-year contract.

Verdict: two-year, $16 million contract

Mike Minor

There aren’t going to be many left-handed relievers with the versatility of Mike Minor available this winter. It means two things can be said about Minor’s offseason outlook. Firstly, he will have plenty of contract offers. And second, the terms of those deals will vary greatly. Not only are teams going to differ on the role they expect Minor to fulfill but also the confidence they have in him to stay healthy.

Not only are teams going to differ on the role they expect Minor to fulfill but also the confidence they have in him staying healthy.

Personally, it’s hard to imagine Minor will remain healthy for the extent of any contract he signs. The question then becomes how much are you willing to lose should that happen. It cost the Kansas City Royals one full season paying Minor, but you could argue he made up for it in 2017. Then again, you could say they paid him starter money for two years, and he gave them outstanding reliever play for one season.

It makes me think teams will be more willing to give him extra money in lieu of another season. Minor is likely seeking a four-year contract, but he could have to settle for three years. Houston has been rumored to be interested, and they will likely be joined by other playoff-caliber teams. There are few left-handed bullpen options who can pitch high-leverage situations — be it the eighth inning, ninth inning or coming on in a jam — the way Minor did in 2017.

Verdict: three-year, $28 million contract

Lorenzo Cain

There’s a chance Cain could be a victim of previous comparable players. Guys like Denard Span and Dexter Fowler signed major contracts the past few years. Neither has been able to perform up to the numbers on the paper they signed.

Age and position are the common factors between Cain and those other players. Span signed for three years and $31 million entering his age-32 season. Fowler, meanwhile, entered his age-31 season after signing a five-year, $82 million deal with the Cardinals. For comparison, Cain will turn 32 in April. Those previous busts will make some teams turn to cheaper options. But a market still exists for a top-of-the-order bat and plus-defender.

Towards the end of the contract, Cain will be able to shift over to right field and not lose a beat. His speed will likely drop off in the coming years, but he should have a few productive seasons before hitting the proverbial wall. The potential landing spots for Cain are as numerous as any free agent on the market. From the Mets, to the Rangers, to the Giants, there are no shortage of viable destinations.

The question becomes what kind of contract is Cain in line to receive. Fowler’s deal, especially with Cain being a year older at the time of signing, could be enough to dissuade teams from giving him five years. It shouldn’t hurt his per-year earning, which should still wind up north of $16 million.

Verdict: four-year, $65 million contract

Mike Moustakas

The Kansas City Royals look unlikely to pursue Moustakas, even in the event Hosmer isn’t retained. That doesn’t mean the slugging third baseman will struggle to find a job this offseason — far from it. Moustakas appears to fit in best with teams looking for that one player to help them get into the playoffs. That would include teams like the Mets, Giants and Angels.

The consensus seems to be that he will be tied down for five years. However, there seems to be a large variation in how much that five-year deal will be worth.

Moustakas will see some teams shy away at his camp’s contract demands for various reasons. Part of which will be based on his age (29) and injury history (torn ACL in 2016). Another big sticking point is simpler: His reputation exceeds his actual production. Other than his 38 home runs, which were 16 more than his previous career-high, he didn’t put up great offensive numbers in 2017.

The fact that his .272 batting average and .314 on-base percentage were each the second-highest marks of his career is bad news. On the other side, his defense has dropped off after his knee injury. It means he could have to transition to designated hitter near the end of his contract — that is if an AL team inks him.

Those negatives notwithstanding, Moustakas will enter a long partnership this winter. The consensus seems to be that he will be tied down for five years. However, there seems to be a large variation in how much that five-year deal will be worth. In the aforementioned article on FanRag Sports, Heyman predicts Moustakas’ five-year contract will earn him $80 million, while the “expert” thinks it will garner him $92 million. Expect something in between.

Verdict: five-year, $85 million contract

Eric Hosmer

There has been more speculation involving Hosmer’s contract than almost any other free agent this offseason. He falls somewhere among the top five free agents on the market, alongside the likes of J.D. Martinez, Jake Arrieta and Yu Darvish. Other than the Kansas City Royals, who seem to be extremely interested in retaining him, Boston has been the destination mentioned most often since the season has ended.

However, the team could decide Martinez makes more sense to sign. Hosmer holds a major advantage in age (28 years old to 30). But Martinez didn’t receive a qualifying offer (because he wasn’t eligible for one) like Hosmer, meaning signing the first baseman would cost the team a draft pick and international signing pool money.

More from Kings of Kauffman

• KC Royals: Let the Ryan O’Hearn Watch begin…again
• KC Royals Roster Moves: 3 players added, 1 re-signed
• KC Royals News: Awards, a new coach, and more
• Why the KC Royals could reunite with this old friend
• 3 outfielders the KC Royals should consider protecting

The Red Sox dropping out of the running would be a huge boon to the Kansas City Royals. However, the other side of that happening — while still preferred — could lead to other teams trying to swoop in and grab Hosmer for cheap. A small difference in contract terms works in the Royals’ favor, though.

At that point, it might come down to the number of years the team is willing to offer. A seven-year deal (or greater) would almost certainly be enough to land Hosmer, regardless of who offers it. The problem is that most teams will be reluctant to offer that kind of guarantee to a player who offers what Hosmer does. He’s never hit more than 25 home runs, only driven in more than 100 runs once and only hit over .300 twice. Despite winning four Gold Gloves, his defense has been questioned extensively by different metrics.

No matter how fans feel about Hosmer, MLB teams seem increasingly unlikely to invest over $150 in a player with those detractions. Now, you may have noticed a pattern in regards to contract years, on the preceding pages. So why go away from that now? The dollar amount for Hosmer is definitely the toughest thing to predict in all of this. But it’s not a stretch to assume he’ll earn at least a couple million more dollars per year than the others.

Verdict: six-year, $130 million contract

Next: Players due to progress or regress in 2018

What do you think, fans? How do you see free agency playing out? Will the market help or hurt the Kansas City Royals and their free agents? Let us know your thoughts.