Sep 13, 2013; Detroit, MI, USA; Kansas City Royals starting pitcher Bruce Chen (52) pitches in the first inning against the Detroit Tigers at Comerica Park. Mandatory Credit: Rick Osentoski-USA TODAY Sports

Bringing Back Bruce Chen Was the Right Move for the Royals

May 31, 2013; Arlington, TX, USA; Kansas City Royals relief pitcher Bruce Chen (52) throws during the game against the Texas Rangers at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington. Texas won 7-2. Mandatory Credit: Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports

It had been hoped by many fans of the Royals that they would resign a certain pitcher who had become a free agent after last season. A certain pitcher that could help stabilize the rotation, and whose excellent performance last year was important as the Royals attempted to remain within striking distance of the Wild Card. While Ervin Santana remains in free agent limbo, the Royals did sign another pitcher who fits the above description in Bruce Chen.

Chen returning may not generate the same type of excitement that Santana would have, but this was a solid move by both sides. Chen made his desire to remain a Royal know from the start of free agency, and his desire has been fulfilled. Now, Chen and the Royals have agreed to terms on a one year contract that guarantees $4.25 Million, and includes a mutual option for the 2015 season. The contract also effectively gives Chen a no-trade clause, as he will be a ‘ten and five’ player in the middle of May.

Bruce Chen entirely revitalized his career with the Royals, producing a 44-33 record with a 4.17 ERA in the past four seasons after struggling upon being recalled in 2009. He has been solid as both a starter and a reliever during his time in Kansas City, and has been almost exactly as effective against right handed and left handed hitters. Over his career, Chen has allowed a .774 OPS against righties, and a .798 OPS to lefties.

That versatility allows Chen to be the ultimate insurance policy for the Royals. He may not be expected to be a part of the rotation coming out of Spring Training, but Chen was not a part of the plans last year either. However, due to the ineffectiveness of other starters, Chen ended up making 15 starts in 2013 anyway. If Wade Davis or Luke Hochevar win one of the spots in the rotation out of Spring Training this year, it is not a lock that they finish the season in that role.

Another possibility that opens up with the resigning of Bruce Chen is a trade of either Davis or Hochevar. All three players are making roughly the same amount this season, and it simply does not make any sense for the Royals to carry three pitchers that all fill the same long relief/spot starter role. The Royals know what they have with Chen – a crafty lefty who may be doing his best to turn into a Panamanian version of Jamie Moyer. Meanwhile, Davis and Hochevar may be thought of as having upside, allowing the Royals to part with them for pieces that could help in the future.

No, Bruce Chen is not the most exciting signing that the Royals could have made. That does not mean, however, that the signing was not a good one (Unless of course, you ascribe to Hunter’s line of thinking). Much like last season, Chen will provide a viable Plan B should the need arise.

Tags: Bruce Chen Kansas City Royals

  • jessanders

    I mostly agree with Hunter’s line of thinking, and my comments on his piece, and others will reflect this.

    However, if they trade either Hoch or Davis, I will retract my criticism of this signing.

    • Dave Hill

      Hunter and I briefly discussed the Chen signing last night. We felt that having the differing viewpoints would be interesting for today.

      I fully expect this move to lead to a trade in the near future.

  • Pingback: Bruce Chen: The Redundant Royal - Kings of Kauffman - A Kansas City Royals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More

  • jimfetterolf

    Hoch and Davis are utterly irrelevant to anyone not signing their paychecks, but are the current fad talking point, been running into it elsewhere. Chen is not interchangeable with either Hoch or Davis, being a lefty junkballing swingman. All three are useful, all three provided fW value last year beyond their costs, total costs for the three were less than Santana’s cost and value was greater, both in fW and in versatility and the simple fact that they were three separate players who in aggregate could be used much more often than once every five days and who helped create a top bullpen.

  • Eric Akers

    Here come the ifs… If Ventura wins a starting spot (as we have heard he should think of it as his to lose), and if the Royals think of Hooch as the 8th inning setup guy if he is not in the starting rotation, then do we need two guys in the pen who can go a few more innings because both Duffy and Ventura have shown a nack for going only 5 innings?
    If spring training shows a different situation, then I think we might see a trade of 1 of those guys. I think the only way they trade one of them is if Hooch is neither in the rotation nor the setup guy.

    • jimfetterolf

      It is Luke’s walk year, so I consider him most likely to be traded, which is one reason why, ceteris paribus, I give Luke an inside track to start, enhances his value if he can just put together six good of eight starts. If he truly fixed his major problem, pitching from the stretch, he should be able to handle the rotation. A reclamation starter is worth more than a reliever.

  • Ed Connealy

    If this leads to a trade it’s defensible.