Kansas City Royals: Why the Royals have a real chance for the playoffs

Royals pitching

When looking at the Royals pitching, here is how the pitching staff performed in 2019 against both AL Central teams and the St. Louis Cardinals.

Starting Rotation

• Brad Keller: 100.1 IP, 2.88 ERA, 73K/40BB
• Jakob Junis: 86.1 IP, 5.12 ERA, 87K/26BB
• Mike Montgomery: 31.1 IP, 5.50 ERA, 27K/7BB
• Danny Duffy: 40.1 IP, 5.61 ERA, 32K/15BB

Bullpen:

• Glenn Sparkman: 73.1 IP, 6.40 ERA, 49K/22BB
• Jorge Lopez: 68.0 IP, 6.09 ERA, 59K/23BB
• Scott Barlow: 34.1 IP, 3.70 ERA, 40K/17BB
• Ian Kennedy: 30.2 IP, 3.58 ERA, 36K/8BB
• Kevin McCarthy: 28.2 IP, 5.74 ERA, 22K/11BB
• Tim Hill: 23.0 IP, 1.57 ERA, 23K/7BB
• Jake Newberry:14.2 IP, 3.17 ERA, 16K/10BB
• Josh Staumont: 10.2 IP, 3.53 ERA, 5K/5BB
• Kyle Zimmer: 9.2 IP, 6.85 ERA, 8K/9BB
• Heath Fillmyer: 9.0 IP, 5.00 ERA, 8K/5BB
• Randy Rosario: 8.0 IP, 4.50 ERA, 4K/2BB
• Gabe Speier: 5.1 IP, 3.53 ERA, 6K/5BB
• Richard Lovelady: 4.1 IP, 21.95 ERA, 3K/4BB
• Trevor Rosenthal: 4.0 IP, 11.25 ERA, 3K/7BB
• Chance Adams: 4.0 IP, 13.50 ERA, 3K/3BB
• Jesse Hahn: 2.2 IP, 8.18 ERA, 3K/2BB

Similar to the offensive numbers though, you have to take sample size into consideration. As you can see, the bullpen has quite a few players who have minimal numbers against the AL/NL Central teams.

And let’s be honest. The pitching for the Royals is probably the bigger area of question/concern than the offense and defense production will be. So where is the silver lining?

Diving into the pitching production

Thought process

Teams have to think differently this year. Especially with pitching. Since this year is a sprint, rather than a marathon, teams have to make analytical decisions quickly, and accurately.

How do they perform against AL/NL opponents? How did they perform during Spring Training? How do they perform in short inning bursts? These are the primary questions I believe should be considered when looking at pitching this year.

What, when, how, why

Let’s operate under the guidelines of having just 13 pitchers. Right out of the gate, four spots are being used by starters Keller, Duffy, Montgomery, Junis. Leaving nine openings. We can go ahead and put Kennedy, Rosenthal, McCarthy, Hill, and Lopez on this list. That leaves four open spots. Based on how Spring Training went, let’s operate under the assumption that those four spots are filled by Staumont, Singer, Barlow, and Lovelady. If we expand the list, the next pitchers to break in would most likely be Zuber, Rosario, Sparkman, and Holland.

So let’s go through the process:

How do they perform against AL/NL opponents?

Regardless of sample size, did the pitchers have success? Here are the 13 pitchers potentially breaking Summer Camp/Spring Training 2.0.

• Brad Keller: 100.1 IP, 2.88 ERA, 73K/40BB
• Jakob Junis: 86.1 IP, 5.12 ERA, 87K/26BB
• Mike Montgomery: 31.1 IP, 5.50 ERA, 27K/7BB
• Danny Duffy: 40.1 IP, 5.61 ERA, 32K/15BB
• Jorge Lopez: 68.0 IP, 6.09 ERA, 59K/23BB
• Scott Barlow: 34.1 IP, 3.70 ERA, 40K/17BB
• Ian Kennedy: 30.2 IP, 3.58 ERA, 36K/8BB
• Kevin McCarthy: 28.2 IP, 5.74 ERA, 22K/11BB
• Tim Hill: 23.0 IP, 1.57 ERA, 23K/7BB
• Josh Staumont: 10.2 IP, 3.53 ERA, 5K/5BB
• Trevor Rosenthal: 4.0 IP, 11.25 ERA, 3K/7BB
• Richard Lovelady: 4.1 IP, 21.95 ERA, 3K/4BB
• Brady Singer: N/A

We can’t lie to ourselves when looking at this. Excluding sample size, besides Keller, Hill, Barlow, Kennedy, and Staumont, the pitching did not have a lot of success last year against AL/NL Central teams. However, maybe another way of looking at the numbers could make things a bit easier to swallow.

How did they perform during Spring Training?

Plenty of Royals pitching had success during Spring Training. Even during the shutdown, we saw videos of pitchers throwing straight gas. Yes, we are looking at you Josh Staumont and your 104mph fastball.

While a couple did not have great Spring Training or were injured during the majority of Spring Training, others flourished.

• Danny Duffy: 2 games, 6.0 innings, 0.00 ERA, 9K/1BB
• Scott Barlow: 5 games, 5.1 innings, 1.69 ERA, 4K/1BB
• Kevin McCarthy: 5 games, 5.0 innings, 3.60 ERA, 6K/4BB
• Josh Staumont: 6 games, 6.0 innings, 0.00 ERA, 10K/3BB
• Trevor Rosenthal: 5 games, 5.0 innings, 0.00 ERA, 9K/0BB
• Richard Lovelady: 5 games, 4.1 innings, 0.00 ERA, 6K/0BB
• Tyler Zuber: 5 games, 6.0 innings, 1.50 ERA, 8K/1BB
• Randy Rosario: 6 games, 6.1 innings, 1.42 ERA, 3K/1BB

For those of you who are curious, these eight pitchers combined for 44.0 innings, 55K/11BB, and a 1.02 ERA during Spring Training. Say what you will about it “just being Spring Training” or the level of competition, being this dominant while working on location and certain pitches aren’t things to scoff at.

“But I only see one starter on this list”

And you would be correct. Keller, Montgomery, and Singer did not have great Spring Training overall. Junis was dealing with a back injury essentially all Spring Training as well, making just one appearance for one inning before being done. Which leads to my next question.

How do they perform in short inning bursts?

This is another component that you need to think about when it comes to the 60-game sprint. Typically, teams try and have starters push for six to seven innings, getting their “quality-start”, allowing teams to not blow through their bullpen and burn those pitchers arms out over a long season.

That, however, is under the premise of 162 games and starters making roughly 30 starts a year. With the season being just 60-games, teams could potentially, and should, function differently. Where a starting pitcher might go through a lineup three times, if the pitchers and teams play their cards right, they could get the starter out of the game after going through the lineup twice and still have great success throughout the year, which could play to be in favor of the Royals.

When looking at the Royals starters progression through the opponent’s lineup, here is how each pitcher performed against the AL Central, plus St. Louis Cardinal:

Keller:

• 1st plate appearance: .188/.255/.278
• 2nd plate appearance: .139/.244/.175
• 3rd plate appearance: .231/.316/.347

Duffy:

• 1st plate appearance: .222/.315/.476
• 2nd plate appearance: .345/.377/.586
• 3rd plate appearance: .136/.136/.273

Montgomery

• 1st plate appearance: .289/.304/.578
• 2nd plate appearance: .307/.342/.462
• 3rd plate appearance: .357/.357.643

Junis:

• 1st plate appearance: .304/.354/.467
• 2nd plate appearance: .215/.264/.393
• 3rd plate appearance: .216/.286/.304

What to make of the numbers

Assuming the Royals perform similarly this year as they did last year, this information shows exactly what was mentioned before. The starters, in small bursts, can be extremely effective. If the anticipation is that the Royals bullpen can be better than last year, and could be the beginning of another run like the 2013-2016 bullpen was, getting through the lineup twice could be enough.