however, I would like to comment on the stated concern (common in articles about this team) of adding a pitcher “while not blocking the young guns”. With a rotation like ours, if the young guns can’t force their way into the rotation, maybe they are more like Dan Reichert (or Kyle Davies) and less like Justin Verlander. Maybe we shouldn’t worry too much about leaving an opportunity for them, when our placeholders aren’t exactly overwhelming.

Montgomery is apparently the only one percolating close to the majors. Lamb is still on the shelf, and probably won’t be right for at least a year after he resumes pitching. Odorizzi is probably at least 1 year out, and maybe 2.

Meanwhile, Sanchez will likely be gone shortly, maybe even mid-season to make room for Montgomery. Chen is already pitching on borrowed time, and Hochever is on the bubble of being a bust (particularly given his draft slot). So no, adding a pitcher for one year (or even more) won’t block anybody. Don’t get me started about having Paulino in our rotation.

imho, adding an ace – even on a mid-long term basis – won’t truly block anybody and will only help the team in both short and long term. In fact, wouldn’t it be nice if Montgomery could just worry about being the 5th starter when he arrives, let him get his legs under him, before the fans and media are desperate for someone – anyone – to lead this rotation? (anyone remember the crushing hype on Alex Gordon?).