Mandatory Credit: Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

The Answer to Royals' Backup Middle Infielder Problem is... Danny Valencia?

As most of you probably know, the Royals are poised to go into the season with five outfielders and no backup middle infielder on the Opening Day roster. I talked about the folly behind such a decision a couple of weeks ago, and I’m not alone in that opinion. With spring training officially underway, the topic is being discussed once again, and this time, the Royals are explaining their thoughts on the matter a bit more clearly. In this article from Jeffrey Flanagan, Dayton Moore points out that rosters change as the season goes on, and if adjustments need to be made along the way, they’ll make them. While that is true, I believe Moore’s statement misses the point of the criticism behind his strategy. Obviously if Alcides Escobar or Omar Infante requires a trip to the disabled list, they’ll be replaced on the 25-man roster. Not having a backup middle infielder is unaffected in a case of an injury that severe. However, the biggest problem remains what the Royals would do if either Escobar or Infante gets banged up early in a game or has to miss just a couple of games.

It may seem unlikely this kind of situation would present itself early in the year, but it’s also unlikely the Royals need to go with a 12-man pitching staff early in the year. The Royals correctly point out that there are more off days in April, plus the possibilities for rainouts, which will offer days to rest players as needed. For some reason, though, the organization doesn’t use that line of thinking in regards to their bullpen. This is yet another instance of the Royals taking a good idea and using it incorrectly, but I’m getting off topic.

Now, it seems the team may have the solution to their backup middle infielder problem. According to Ned Yost, Danny Valencia is going to be taking some reps at second base.

Yes. That Danny Valencia.

The Royals appear comfortable taking a poor defender at a less difficult position and moving him to a position he’s never played professionally that requires more range and better hands. This, for a team whose pitching staff has three starters who must have excellent defense behind them to produce good results. What could possibly go wrong?

Again, I fully understand that such a situation may not present itself in the regular season. I also understand that Valencia might only have to fill in at second for a game or two. But, the Royals should understand that in their current position on the win curve, they can’t be giving away runs defensively. One or two games could very well be the difference between making the playoffs and sitting at home for yet another October.

I like the idea of having Valencia on the roster, especially as a potential platoon partner for Mike Moustakas, and for the right-handed power he brings to the bench. But despite Valencia’s and Yost’s claims that the former is more than just a lefty masher, he hasn’t had an OPS over .630 against right-handed pitching since 2010. Valencia simply doesn’t offer any real versatility. He’s a third baseman who hits left-handed pitching well, and that’s fine. There’s value with that kind of player. The team has also said they like his defense at first base better than Billy Butler‘s, which I find interesting for a couple of reasons. First, Valencia has played all of 28 professional games at first base in his career, and just 6 since 2009, so there isn’t a whole lot of evidence on which to base their claim. Also, the Royals apparently find it more important to have a 2nd backup first baseman than to have a backup middle infielder. For a team that relies on defense, that’s a pretty bold strategy.

I’ll grant that we’re still a few weeks away from Opening Day, and the team’s thoughts on the matter could change, but the fact that they appear set on going without a backup shortstop or second baseman is troubling. There are quite a few scenarios in which this roster decision could come back to bite the Royals, even if they do eventually add a utility infielder a couple of months into the season. To me, it makes more sense to go with a 6-man bullpen and someone like Pedro Ciriaco on the bench early on, then adjust as needed. That would give the team more flexibility for late inning situations, and it would prevent the Royals from having a bad defender in a more important defensive position. Valencia is a solid player to have on the bench, but a second baseman he is not.

Next Royals Game View full schedule »
Wednesday, Sep 33 Sep7:10Texas RangersBuy Tickets

Tags: Danny Valencia Kansas City Royals

  • jessanders

    Couldn’t really agree more.

  • moretrouble

    This idea that the team could go with a bullpen of 6 is lunacy. What might happen, is go with 4 STARTERS early in April because with all the off days, they probably won’t need 5 until late in the month.

    But, going without a middle infield back-up is also lunacy. Infante went down last year for an extended time and they’re definitely going to need someone. It’s pretty hard to play around the 2B bag without getting dinged up.

    • jimfetterolf

      Given that at least one of the starters will have spent quality time in the ‘pen last year, that is a possibility.

      • moretrouble

        What’s possible? Anything is possible. Who knows, the season might be canceled. What’s likely is something different.

        • jimfetterolf

          I was agreeing with your four starters idea.

    • Dave Hill

      MT – I looked at the schedule a couple of days ago. The Royals only have four off days, two of which sandwich a three game set with the Twins. They also have stretches of eight and thirteen games without an off day during April. They can go a week or so without the fifth starter, but they will need someone for at least three or four starts.

      Besides, Yost is not exactly known for being creative or thinking outside the box.

  • jimfetterolf

    Both Moose and Billy were SS in high school :) Beyond that, I learned a long time ago to watch what happens rather than what is said, although I think it more likely that Moose will stink this year than it is that Escobar gets hurt. And not everyone is 100% convinced that the Hosmer fix will stick. I do prefer the six man ‘pen, though.

  • Marcus Meade

    Yeah, the idea of carrying 5 outfielders, 12 pitchers, and no backup middle infielder probably isn’t bright. I wouldn’t mind seeing the 6 bullpen guys and a middle infielder, but if they do that, then I want them to trade Hoch and/or Davis before the season. If they go with only 6 bullpen pitchers someone who is good and cheap (probably Louis Coleman) is going to get sent to Omaha. Actually, a few someones who are good and cheap will probably be sent to Omaha. I’d rather trade Hoch and/or Davis and then shuttle guys back and forth if need be. Also, I wouldn’t mind only carrying 4 outfielders like every other team in baseball. If it comes down to it, I think they can wave Maxwell and sign him once he clears wavers. I think he’s more likely to clear wavers than Dyson, and Dyson is more valuable to this team. That’s a simpler solution. Both probably work better than no backup middle infielder though.

  • jimfetterolf

    It was mentioned yesterday that Valencia would get reps in the OF. And he was a 1B in college. And the reason that normal teams don’t think of five OFs is they don’t have Cain in center.

  • Pingback: Brett Hayes is not an Option as a Utility Player - Kings of Kauffman - A Kansas City Royals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More

  • Pingback: Royals' Middle Infield Injuries Could Make Roster Decisions Difficult