May 9, 2012; Kansas City, MO, USA; Kansas City Royals general manager Dayton Moore watches batting practice before a game against the Boston Red Sox at Kauffman Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Peter G. Aiken-US PRESSWIRE

The Monday Rant: On Second Thought


Thirty-nine homeruns allowed in 178 innings. An ERA of 5.16; a FIP of 5.63; an xFIP of 4.48. A pitcher entering his age 30 season with declining velocity, declining strikeout rate, and coming off a year in which he was the worst starting pitcher in all of baseball (according to fWAR). And the Royals just agreed to pay him $12 million.

Too often bloggers and commentators that follow the Kansas City Royals get put into the box of being critical without ever examining the other side of the equation. Too often bloggers and commentators that follow the Kansas City Royals are labeled as negative, or a troll, without ever asking the most important questions on the subject about the validity and competence of an organization that cannot get out of it’s own way. And too often bloggers and commentators that follow the Kansas City Royals can get caught up in their own fandom, their own emotions, and their own desires to finally to cheer and write for a winner.

After the Royals acquired a pitcher for whom there is little compelling argument that he is definitively better than any arm currently on the staff, I was overcome with my own subjective likes of Ervin Santana’s stuff, delivery, reputation and past to see it for what it really was. No doubt, the Royals were in the same boat, otherwise the trade of a minor league arm and the committing to a percentage of the payroll a team should never commit to Ervin Santana, wouldn’t have happened.

At first glance the trade seemed to be a win. The Royals acquired a pitcher that would have been sought after (to what extent is arguable) in the free agent market, and there is a glaring need in at least four of the five starting rotation spots. But the concern before any of the offseason musical chairs started, was that Dayton Moore would enter the market too soon, overpay for a talent that would have been readily available for less, and not really find anyone that would make that much of a difference anyway.

Sadly, that is exactly what happened.

Over the past four seasons there is no discernable difference between Santana, Luke Hochevar, and Bruce Chen. Sure there’s the occasional peak in strikeout numbers, but other than 2008 when Santana had the best year of his career, he’s gotten steadily worse and bottomed out in 2012 with a -0.9 fWAR.

Say what you will about Hochevar, and fans will, he’s been remarkably consistent (just barely over average) throughout his career, and he was better than Santana last year. Oh, and he’s a year younger.

So when it comes to justifying the acquisition, fans should take what they know and what they think of Luke Hochevar, and then ask themselves if they would approve of giving him $12 million next season. Changes things a little, doesn’t it?

But this is to be expected. The history of Dayton Moore as general manager of the Royals lends itself to predicting these kinds of scenarios; boxing himself into a corner of perceived need, only to come out swinging with large sums of dollars given to Willie Bloomquist, Horacio Ramirez, and Jeff Francoeur.

Sure there’s the idea that players don’t want to play in Kansas City (because they’re perennially a loser, and who’s to blame for that?) and they’ll have to overpay for lesser players on the open market, but that argument is a cop-out, an easy excuse for why role players and bad players are handed more money than anyone else in baseball would do.

This is also where the flaw in The Process rears its ugly head. Not everything can be built entirely from within, and while small market teams that struggle to get out of the bottom of the standings will spend their time telling you that free agency is a bad route to go when building a team, they ignore the fact that it is a necessary one.

The idea that teams “cannot be built through free agency” is a laughable cause continually trumpeted by organizations that show ineptness in how to use it correctly. And the organizations that routinely use that phrase as the answer to a question that wasn’t asked, like the Royals, are also ones that are so afraid, so petrified of spending their available dollars poorly, that they back into situations to do just that by convincing themselves that there is no other way.

It’s what happens when you draft Luke Hochevar No.1 overall (think whatever you like about that subject) and fail to develop him. It’s what happens when your top two organizational draft picks, whom you’ve touted as sure-fire stars, both put up on-base percentages lower than .310 in their sophomore seasons. It’s what happens when, entering year seven of a regime, the entire starting rotation could be swapped out for five new names, and no one would bat an eye.

Ervin Santana being acquired isn’t the problem, solely. He’s a sign. He’s yet anther worrisome acquisition that shows where the Royals current administration is lacking, and how far behind the rest of the league it puts them.

Trading for and picking up the option on Santana wouldn’t be that much of a head scratching move if we didn’t know what we already know. Dayton Moore is the one that talks more than most about the payroll limitations laid upon him as general manager of a small market team. And he’s also the one that just agreed to pay 12 million dollars next year to a pitcher that was statistically worse than all the starting pitchers in the Royals rotation. And he did so before the rest of baseball showed him if he should.

Next Royals Game View full schedule »
Friday, Aug 2929 Aug7:10Cleveland IndiansBuy Tickets

Tags: Ervin Santana Kansas City Royals Luke Hochevar

  • jimfetterolf

    A lot of good points, but I’ll not crucify Dayton Moore just yet, and don’t see the Santana trade as yet another reason to fire GMDM. Santana’s another coin-flip, although an expensive one, kind of like Jon Sanchez, we hope for the 2010 rather than the 2012 version. My big worry about Santana is the decaying velocity, too often a harbinger of diagnosis of injury, but his splits from last year showed really rotten April and July and pretty good rest of the season. That, along with a decent career, probably makes him worth the risk. His HR% last year looks aberrant and a return to mean will make some difference in results.

    Dayton Moore isn’t going anywhere. The Negative Nancy Niche might as well accept that. I think he’s done a fine job with what he started with, so we can hope for good health and that Hoz and Moose decide that they’re willing to accept coaching and get filthy rich.

  • LastRoyalsFan

    What a depressing perspective. I guess I’ll just go jump off the upper deck at Kauffman Stadium.

  • Eric Akers

    I honestly don’t see much negative to this trade. He is being overpaid, and that is the cost of trying a guy out for a single year only. I can’t see the money we are paying him as preventing us from getting a single other player simply because this is a year only contract. We can backload any other deal. We would likely not be able to sign a guy for a single year contract through free agency. It was luck that Jackson signed one last year, and for $10 million.

    I see this as taking a flier on a “buy low” player (a player at low value, not what he is being paid). A player that showed good work the second half of last season. A player that has the possibility to improve our rotation and/or be moved at the trading deadline. If this was a two year deal, I would not like it at all. But for one year, I don’t mind taking a chance.

    As far as moving on the market too soon, the Marlins looked into trading for Santana and “The Twins were “in heavily” on Santana” all according to mlb trade rumors. I am unsure the guy would have even been available. It is possible he could have been, and it is possible that he would have been available for one year at less money, but I am thinking that is actually a small possibility. Those are just my thoughts on Santana.

    Now it looks as though Guthrie wants 3 years $34 million. I don’t know how much he will get, but seems like a lot more than he is worth. Is everybody going to be overpaid in free agency? I am now hoping we might be able to swing some high risk high reward guys like McCarthy.

    • jimfetterolf

      New media money coming in ’14 will inflate multi-year contracts this winter. I’ld take Guthrie at the 3/34. Heard Anibal Sanchez is looking 6/90. Sign him. Both can then be traded after a couple of years when the minors finally produce some home-grown starters.

      Trade Gordon and either trade or release Hoch and that pays for Sanchez. Orioles are interested in Billy, who will be a 40/120 in Baltimore’s bandbox. That frees some millions and returns a good load of prospects. The Tampa/Oakland model is trade good veterans for prospects and salary relief. I think we have to follow that.