http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/19/royal-busts-part-1/ A Kansas City Royals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More Thu, 29 Nov 2012 02:29:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/19/royal-busts-part-1/#comment-2019971 Brett_Christie Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:11:39 +0000 http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=11823#comment-2019971 What wordsmith wrote that line!? @michaelengel #Royals What wordsmith wrote that line!? @michaelengel #Royals

]]> http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/19/royal-busts-part-1/#comment-2019970 michael.allen.engel Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:10:06 +0000 http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=11823#comment-2019970 Nice stuff. Glad you're rolling this idea out there, as I've had it in mind for a while but never really connected things enough to get it into words - I've had some mild concern about what examples like George might mean for the Monty/Duffy/Dwyer types. Maybe it's easy to say that our lefties now are better - but George was still a #1 prospect at one point. Nice stuff. Glad you’re rolling this idea out there, as I’ve had it in mind for a while but never really connected things enough to get it into words – I’ve had some mild concern about what examples like George might mean for the Monty/Duffy/Dwyer types. Maybe it’s easy to say that our lefties now are better – but George was still a #1 prospect at one point.

]]> http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/19/royal-busts-part-1/#comment-5905 Brett_Christie Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:11:39 +0000 http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=11823#comment-5905 What wordsmith wrote that line!? @michaelengel #Royals What wordsmith wrote that line!? @michaelengel #Royals

]]> http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/19/royal-busts-part-1/#comment-5904 michael.allen.engel Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:10:06 +0000 http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=11823#comment-5904 Nice stuff. Glad you're rolling this idea out there, as I've had it in mind for a while but never really connected things enough to get it into words - I've had some mild concern about what examples like George might mean for the Monty/Duffy/Dwyer types. Maybe it's easy to say that our lefties now are better - but George was still a #1 prospect at one point. Nice stuff. Glad you’re rolling this idea out there, as I’ve had it in mind for a while but never really connected things enough to get it into words – I’ve had some mild concern about what examples like George might mean for the Monty/Duffy/Dwyer types. Maybe it’s easy to say that our lefties now are better – but George was still a #1 prospect at one point.

]]>