<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: True Starting Pitching Improvements?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/17/true-starting-pitching-improvements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/17/true-starting-pitching-improvements/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Royals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 02:29:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Know, Luke Hochevar, You Know - Kings of Kauffman - A Kansas City Royals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/17/true-starting-pitching-improvements/#comment-5925</link>
		<dc:creator>You Know, Luke Hochevar, You Know - Kings of Kauffman - A Kansas City Royals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=11784#comment-5925</guid>
		<description>[...] about what he might mean to a rotation that is not only turning over very little, but projects to not change significantly from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about what he might mean to a rotation that is not only turning over very little, but projects to not change significantly from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gage Matthews</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/17/true-starting-pitching-improvements/#comment-2019964</link>
		<dc:creator>Gage Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=11784#comment-2019964</guid>
		<description> You&#039;re absolutely right about Davies. He is definitely incredibly bad, especially considering how long the Royals held on to him. So, really, almost anyone would be an improvement over him.

 

I just can&#039;t decide on Sanchez and Hoch. I&#039;ve had a really hard time figuring out what to think about them. Sanchez started the year pretty well, compiling a 3.38 ERA with about two strikeouts per every walk from March to May. During that time, he used his changeup as his second-best pitch and as his &quot;whiff&quot; pitch, leaving his slider to third position. Once he got past May, however (and around his struggle with tendonitis), he used more sliders than changes and his pitches scattered a bit more as his ERA jumped to 5.79 with a walk per strikeout. However, much of that ineffectiveness likely resulted from Sanchez&#039; tendonitis and later ankle sprain rather than any thing he was particularly doing. So, supposing he can rebound and pitch like his early-season self, he could be a considerable asset for the rotation. Even with a 3.75-4 ERA, he would be tremendously useful. I just admittedly haven&#039;t seen him pitch or watched enough to know what to expect from him, but we&#039;ll see.

 

As for Hoch, well, I think I&#039;m going to write up a whole piece on him, so I&#039;ll hold off on that until later.

 

Thanks for reading and for the response!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You&#8217;re absolutely right about Davies. He is definitely incredibly bad, especially considering how long the Royals held on to him. So, really, almost anyone would be an improvement over him.</p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t decide on Sanchez and Hoch. I&#8217;ve had a really hard time figuring out what to think about them. Sanchez started the year pretty well, compiling a 3.38 ERA with about two strikeouts per every walk from March to May. During that time, he used his changeup as his second-best pitch and as his &#8220;whiff&#8221; pitch, leaving his slider to third position. Once he got past May, however (and around his struggle with tendonitis), he used more sliders than changes and his pitches scattered a bit more as his ERA jumped to 5.79 with a walk per strikeout. However, much of that ineffectiveness likely resulted from Sanchez&#8217; tendonitis and later ankle sprain rather than any thing he was particularly doing. So, supposing he can rebound and pitch like his early-season self, he could be a considerable asset for the rotation. Even with a 3.75-4 ERA, he would be tremendously useful. I just admittedly haven&#8217;t seen him pitch or watched enough to know what to expect from him, but we&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>As for Hoch, well, I think I&#8217;m going to write up a whole piece on him, so I&#8217;ll hold off on that until later.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading and for the response!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gage Matthews</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/17/true-starting-pitching-improvements/#comment-5897</link>
		<dc:creator>Gage Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=11784#comment-5897</guid>
		<description> You&#039;re absolutely right about Davies. He is definitely incredibly bad, especially considering how long the Royals held on to him. So, really, almost anyone would be an improvement over him.

 

I just can&#039;t decide on Sanchez and Hoch. I&#039;ve had a really hard time figuring out what to think about them. Sanchez started the year pretty well, compiling a 3.38 ERA with about two strikeouts per every walk from March to May. During that time, he used his changeup as his second-best pitch and as his &quot;whiff&quot; pitch, leaving his slider to third position. Once he got past May, however (and around his struggle with tendonitis), he used more sliders than changes and his pitches scattered a bit more as his ERA jumped to 5.79 with a walk per strikeout. However, much of that ineffectiveness likely resulted from Sanchez&#039; tendonitis and later ankle sprain rather than any thing he was particularly doing. So, supposing he can rebound and pitch like his early-season self, he could be a considerable asset for the rotation. Even with a 3.75-4 ERA, he would be tremendously useful. I just admittedly haven&#039;t seen him pitch or watched enough to know what to expect from him, but we&#039;ll see.

 

As for Hoch, well, I think I&#039;m going to write up a whole piece on him, so I&#039;ll hold off on that until later.

 

Thanks for reading and for the response!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You&#8217;re absolutely right about Davies. He is definitely incredibly bad, especially considering how long the Royals held on to him. So, really, almost anyone would be an improvement over him.</p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t decide on Sanchez and Hoch. I&#8217;ve had a really hard time figuring out what to think about them. Sanchez started the year pretty well, compiling a 3.38 ERA with about two strikeouts per every walk from March to May. During that time, he used his changeup as his second-best pitch and as his &#8220;whiff&#8221; pitch, leaving his slider to third position. Once he got past May, however (and around his struggle with tendonitis), he used more sliders than changes and his pitches scattered a bit more as his ERA jumped to 5.79 with a walk per strikeout. However, much of that ineffectiveness likely resulted from Sanchez&#8217; tendonitis and later ankle sprain rather than any thing he was particularly doing. So, supposing he can rebound and pitch like his early-season self, he could be a considerable asset for the rotation. Even with a 3.75-4 ERA, he would be tremendously useful. I just admittedly haven&#8217;t seen him pitch or watched enough to know what to expect from him, but we&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>As for Hoch, well, I think I&#8217;m going to write up a whole piece on him, so I&#8217;ll hold off on that until later.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading and for the response!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmeade17</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/17/true-starting-pitching-improvements/#comment-2019958</link>
		<dc:creator>mmeade17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=11784#comment-2019958</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree a little. I&#039;d say the subtraction of Kyle Davies is at least a slight step forward. Replacing him has to be worth 3-4 wins. He is, statistically speaking, the worst pitcher in Major League history, right (or close at least)? I think Duffy takes a step forward (E.R.A in the low 4s). I think Sanchez bounces back a little, not to 2010 numbers, but he wants to make his free agency case (E.R.A in high 3s-low 4s). I agree that Paulino will regress. He can&#039;t throw a fastball that flat and expect to miss bats (E.R.A in high 4s). Chen will probably be Chen (E.R.A in high 3s-low 4s. Hoch is the wild card, the true barometer of how well this pitching staff will do. There was a great piece on fangraphs about how his second-half success was predicated on the use of more sliders and slightly fewer fastballs. Surely, the Royals no this and will attempt to build game plans around it. Hoch&#039;s slider is killer if he uses it (E.R.A. 3.7-4.3). So, I think they&#039;ll take at least a slight step forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree a little. I&#8217;d say the subtraction of Kyle Davies is at least a slight step forward. Replacing him has to be worth 3-4 wins. He is, statistically speaking, the worst pitcher in Major League history, right (or close at least)? I think Duffy takes a step forward (E.R.A in the low 4s). I think Sanchez bounces back a little, not to 2010 numbers, but he wants to make his free agency case (E.R.A in high 3s-low 4s). I agree that Paulino will regress. He can&#8217;t throw a fastball that flat and expect to miss bats (E.R.A in high 4s). Chen will probably be Chen (E.R.A in high 3s-low 4s. Hoch is the wild card, the true barometer of how well this pitching staff will do. There was a great piece on fangraphs about how his second-half success was predicated on the use of more sliders and slightly fewer fastballs. Surely, the Royals no this and will attempt to build game plans around it. Hoch&#8217;s slider is killer if he uses it (E.R.A. 3.7-4.3). So, I think they&#8217;ll take at least a slight step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmeade17</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2012/01/17/true-starting-pitching-improvements/#comment-5889</link>
		<dc:creator>mmeade17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=11784#comment-5889</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree a little. I&#039;d say the subtraction of Kyle Davies is at least a slight step forward. Replacing him has to be worth 3-4 wins. He is, statistically speaking, the worst pitcher in Major League history, right (or close at least)? I think Duffy takes a step forward (E.R.A in the low 4s). I think Sanchez bounces back a little, not to 2010 numbers, but he wants to make his free agency case (E.R.A in high 3s-low 4s). I agree that Paulino will regress. He can&#039;t throw a fastball that flat and expect to miss bats (E.R.A in high 4s). Chen will probably be Chen (E.R.A in high 3s-low 4s. Hoch is the wild card, the true barometer of how well this pitching staff will do. There was a great piece on fangraphs about how his second-half success was predicated on the use of more sliders and slightly fewer fastballs. Surely, the Royals no this and will attempt to build game plans around it. Hoch&#039;s slider is killer if he uses it (E.R.A. 3.7-4.3). So, I think they&#039;ll take at least a slight step forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree a little. I&#8217;d say the subtraction of Kyle Davies is at least a slight step forward. Replacing him has to be worth 3-4 wins. He is, statistically speaking, the worst pitcher in Major League history, right (or close at least)? I think Duffy takes a step forward (E.R.A in the low 4s). I think Sanchez bounces back a little, not to 2010 numbers, but he wants to make his free agency case (E.R.A in high 3s-low 4s). I agree that Paulino will regress. He can&#8217;t throw a fastball that flat and expect to miss bats (E.R.A in high 4s). Chen will probably be Chen (E.R.A in high 3s-low 4s. Hoch is the wild card, the true barometer of how well this pitching staff will do. There was a great piece on fangraphs about how his second-half success was predicated on the use of more sliders and slightly fewer fastballs. Surely, the Royals no this and will attempt to build game plans around it. Hoch&#8217;s slider is killer if he uses it (E.R.A. 3.7-4.3). So, I think they&#8217;ll take at least a slight step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 8/12 queries in 0.374 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 320/329 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: kingsofkauffman.com @ 2013-06-19 10:56:35 by W3 Total Cache -->