You’re right about the age-ist comment. I should know better than to generalize like that when it’s the very thing that I hate about baseball writers and people.

I find it funny though that someone charged with a place at a newspaper would take so easily to the team they write abouts position lock-stock and sound-bite, and never have cause for even the slightest second guessing. (Even though, in his post like week, Judge does just that, play general manager.) It’s amusing to me that baseball front office types peddle their abilities of player evaluation as somehow greater than (when there’s no justifiable reason they are) and other people just fall in line with that thinking.

You’re right about the age-ist comment. I should know better than to generalize like that when it’s the very thing that I hate about baseball writers and people.

I find it funny though that someone charged with a place at a newspaper would take so easily to the team they write abouts position lock-stock and sound-bite, and never have cause for even the slightest second guessing. (Even though, in his post like week, Judge does just that, play general manager.) It’s amusing to me that baseball front office types peddle their abilities of player evaluation as somehow greater than (when there’s no justifiable reason they are) and other people just fall in line with that thinking.

Thanks, I needed a good laugh on a dreary, dreary Kansas City morning.

You’re right on, here though I resent (resemble) the age-ist remark. First, it is tiresome to listen to the scrappy player rap incessantly during the season. If baseball reveals one thing, it reveals — as you point out — DNA.

When you sign on to be GM, you sign on to be second guessed. The argument that no one knows enough to second guess is like the argument that no one knows what the president of the United States knows — really knows… all the little secrets — so no one can really second guess the president. I’ve noticed it is mostly presidents and their supporters who say this.

Thanks, I needed a good laugh on a dreary, dreary Kansas City morning.

You’re right on, here though I resent (resemble) the age-ist remark. First, it is tiresome to listen to the scrapy player rap incesiantly during the season. If baseball reveals one thing, it reveals — as you point out — DNA.

When you sign on to be GM, you sign on to be second guessed. The argument that no one knows enough to second guess is like the argument that no one knows what the president of the United States knows — really knows… all the little secrets — so no one can really second guess the president. I’ve noticed it is mostly presidents and their supporters who say this.

Thanks, I needed a good laugh on a dreary, dreary Kansas City morning.

You’re right on, here though I resent (resemble) the age-ist remark. First, it is tiresome to listen to the scrappy player rap incessantly during the season. If baseball reveals one thing, it reveals — as you point out — DNA.

When you sign on to be GM, you sign on to be second guessed. The argument that no one knows enough to second guess is like the argument that no one knows what the president of the United States knows — really knows… all the little secrets — so no one can really second guess the president. I’ve noticed it is mostly presidents and their supporters who say this.

Thanks, I needed a good laugh on a dreary, dreary Kansas City morning.

You’re right on, here though I resent (resemble) the age-ist remark. First, it is tiresome to listen to the scrapy player rap incesiantly during the season. If baseball reveals one thing, it reveals — as you point out — DNA.

When you sign on to be GM, you sign on to be second guessed. The argument that no one knows enough to second guess is like the argument that no one knows what the president of the United States knows — really knows… all the little secrets — so no one can really second guess the president. I’ve noticed it is mostly presidents and their supporters who say this.