Royals Sign Jonathan Broxton

by KC Royals

Photo by Chris Williams/Icon SMI

It was announced today by baseball media types that the Royals have signed right-handed reliever Jonathan Broxton to a one-year, $4 million deal with an extra $1 million in incentives based on games pitched. Broxton, a 6’4″, 300-pound 27-year old and former Los Angeles Dodger, just ended a two-year contract that paid him $4 million in 2010 and $7 million in 2011. It was reported that more than ten teams were likely in on Broxton before he signed with Kansas City, so the Royals must have offered something significant – money, a guaranteed spot on the Opening Day roster, or something else – to get him signed. I’ll run through Broxton’s history and the implications for the Royals after the jump.

Broxton has been an interesting story the last couple years. After building his career to a point where he had a 2.61 ERA in 2009, putting the end on four consecutive years with an ERA under 3.15, he stumbled with his new contract. His ERA jumped to 4.04 in 2010 and 5.68 in 2011, and he experience some significant injury issues in the 2011 campaign, limiting him to 12.2 innings. Broxton has a power arm, throwing 11.5 strikeouts per nine innings over his career, but has also thrown 3.7 walks per nine innings. To be fair, every Royals reliever that threw at least 50 innings in 2011 gave up more walks than Broxton (with the notable exceptions of Joakim Soria and Greg Holland, and we’ll come back to them later). I wanted to see if Broxton’s BABIP experienced an unusual hike over the last two seasons, but he has always had a relatively high number (.314 over his career). He just walked more, struck out fewer, and gave up more hits in 2010 and 2011, which accounts for the difference. Broxton has the pure ability and talent to help the club in the set-up role they’ve set aside for him.

The issue that we have to consider is whether Broxton will be healthy enough throughout the season. He underwent arthroscopic elbow surgery in September and the recovery time should have him ready for the season. Of course, the Royals have several young relievers ready to go in the case that Broxton breaks down, but it’s worth keeping in mind that Broxton may not last the year. On the other hand, the Royals’ Jeff Francis was an injury risk going into 2011 and pitched 183 innings. It’s something to be cautious about, but it will hopefully work out for the Royals.

This does cause a chain reaction for the Royals. Adding Broxton to the 40-man roster means a ripple effect will boot someone else off. It could be someone that was just added, but it’s hard to say whom. The other possibility, and a fairly likely one at that, is that there will be some sort of trade to open up a spot. Of course, that’s only likely if the Royals have some trade waiting in the wings and could now pull the trigger. Lots of rumors have been swirling around a trade for Toronto Blue Jays centerfielder Colby Rasmus, who was supposedly a thorn in the side of Tony LaRussa and the St. Louis Cardinals until they traded him to Toronto this past season. With speculation that the Royals brass might not be ready to hand Lorenzo Cain a starting position in centerfield, it could be a possibility.

Who would the Royals’ trade package center around? The biggest choice is probably Joakim Soria, who has become expendable with the development of Greg Holland and some other young relievers. As Broxton has already been pegged as the set-up man, Soria could be moved in favor of Holland in the closer role. In fact, this seems so likely to me that I would guess Soria isn’t a Royal in 2012. Though that’s hard to imagine for some of us, it’s been a long time coming. Rumors have followed Soria every offseason, so this might be the one that finally sees him moved.

Edit: Bob Dutton of the KC Star tweeted that the Royals will likely look to build a “killer bullpen” since starting pitchers are pretty expensive right now. Royals announce Broxton as set-up man for Soria. So, take that into account when debating trades, moves, etc.

It’s going to be an interesting next week or two for Royals fans and gossips. My bet is on a Soria-for-Rasmus deal, but whether there will be more to that deal remains to be seen. Let me know what you think in the comments.

You can stay current on all the Kings of Kauffman content and news by following us on TwitterFacebook, or by way of our RSS feed. You can follow Gage on Twitter.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Kevin Scobee 11 pts

Side note: the glove clear and scap load from Broxton in this picture makes me giggle and blush like a school girl.

JasonPersinger 6 pts

Everybody keeps saying that this move means Soria is on the move and while I think this move does open up that scenario to me the more likely scenario is that the Royals think they will not find the top half rotation starter they want (see also Bruce Chen signing) and are going to instead take a serious look at having crow or holland be a starter. Broxton signed to fill one of their roles in the back end setting up for soria and not freeing up soria to be traded. Instead freeing them up to work as potential starters.

jim fetterolf 16 pts

Colby Rasmus is a nothing sort of player with production that has decayed, so I'ld rather have David Lough if Lorenzo Cain can't do the job, unlikely given his history and skill set. If Soria is traded, we need a 2nd baseman. If he's not traded, Broxton expands the back end of the bullpen and gives more protection to our five inning starters, giving us two power set-ups for the 7th and 8th inning to bridge to Soria. With Soria, Holland, Broxton, Herrera, Coleman, Collins, and Teaford we should be able to cover for 5 to 6 inning average starts and Teaford would work as the swing man, long reliever and spot starter.(paragraph) Colby Rasmus' fangraphs page shows his last two years of fielding as in Melky territory and his good .366 wOBA in '10 as likely a result of a BABIP 56 points higher than his career average. He doesn't walk much, strikes out a lot, doesn't steal, has become a poor fielder. He shouldn't be in the conversation on trading for a proven closer.

eric.akers 11 pts

This move seems a little surprising to me. But my first thought was that Soria may be on the move. However, if we can get Rasmus, I am all for it. I am wondering why The Jays would part with him though. It seems to me that they would require somebody else along with Soria.

Gage Matthews 10 pts

eric.akers I've been thinking the same thing, Eric. With Soria's value a little down from previous years and Rasmus' seemingly fairly high with his importance to the Toronto outfield, I wondered if it wouldn't take Soria and Cain or Soria and someone else to do it.

And yes, this was pretty surprising. Definitely wasn't expecting to see this news when I got to work.

jim fetterolf 16 pts

Gage Matthewseric.akers I guess that I'm missing Rasmus' value. I checked him out on fangraphs and he had a freakishly good year in '10, driven by a .354 BABIP, then turned in an '11 season that looked a lot like '09 and seemed predictable based on his minor league production. He has had two consecutive bad defensive seasons, so is a major downgrade from Cain while his bat looks more like '11 Giavotella than anyone, has some pop, not much average, doesn't walk much and strikes out a lot. On top of that, we don't need a CF, we need SPs and a 2nd baseman. Soria is an asset and we can still use him, even with the Broxton signing, and will need him given that several of our projected starters tend to have high pitch counts in a short number of innings. With five to six inning starters, a deep, strong bullpen is needed.

Gage Matthews 10 pts

jim fetterolferic.akers I (and others, I think) see Rasmus as being in a similar situation as Gordon has been. He hasn't been consistent or found total success at the major league level outside of the BABIP-boosted 2010, but he still has the potential to be something pretty solid. I can't say that I'd be thrilled to trade Soria for him, I wouldn't be against it, either. And with the plethora of relievers the Royals seem to have, that may be a spot they could afford to lose someone to potentially improve their offense for 2012 from where it stands now. It's hedging a lot of bets, but Rasmus has that potential. Whether it ever completely emerges remains to be seen.

michael.allen.engel 32 pts moderator

Gage Matthewsjim fetterolferic.akers Worth noting that in 2010, he struck out 148 times - and yes, strikeouts are bad, but they aren't instant death and he still hit .276 with a 22% line drive rate. His BABIP was influenced as much by those outs that didn't go into play.

He's 25 - I see no issue with Rasmus, though I don't think that he's going to be worth what we'd have to give up for him. We do need starters, but I'm more than comfortable with Gio at 2nd. Maybe he's not going to be elite, but how many elite second basemen are there?

I'll have more on the Broxton signing and its implications later tonight though - don't wanna spoil them here. Sneak peek: let's all slow down...no need to read into this more than it is.

jim fetterolf 16 pts

Gage Matthewseric.akers I may have missed it, but I see nothing in Rasmus' professional career to comp him to Gordon, a top draft choice who destroyed the minor leagues on his way up the ladder. In Cardinals AAA over 90 games he produced an old-school line of .251/11/36 with a wOBA of .335.

jim fetterolf 16 pts

michael.allen.engelGage Matthewseric.akers Rasmus may have no issues, but we already have Cain, so a minus defensive CF isn't a need at the moment for us when we have Cain and Dyson. Soria is way too valuable to trade for a mediocre component that we don't need.

Gage Matthews 10 pts

jim fetterolferic.akers Which is why I said "a similar situation" rather than the exact same situation. Not minor leagues. Major leagues, age, and point in his career.

jim fetterolf 16 pts

Gage Matthewseric.akers Valid enough. The main difference between the two is that Rasmus' one good offensive season was an apparent aberration while Gordon's past year could be reasonably expected based on his college and minor league performance and could have happened earlier without the two years of injuries. Would you trade Gordon for Rasmus, whose defense the last two years plays better in left? Not trying to be argumentative, I just am not seeing Rasmus as worth more than a player to be named later to us. We have no need, he's not an upgrade in any tools over Cain, we have minor leaguers who can fill in if needed, and Soria is a valuable asset to this team and shouldn't just be given away. (paragraph) Been having the same discussion on pinetar and Royals Authority and still haven't seen anyone post anything that shows Rasmus worth what Soria is. Some have gone so far as to state that we should throw Cain and a AA arm in with Soria to get Rasmus. Fortunately, I doubt GMDM has any intention of taking Rasmus and if Soria is traded it will be for good value at a position of weakness, just as with the Melky trade.

michael.allen.engel 32 pts moderator

jim fetterolfGage Matthewseric.akers They're different players who have come up differently. Rasmus was drafted out of high school; Gordon came out of college. Gordon played one minor league season and was called up, then ended up looking like a Four A player until last year mostly because he was older and more polished/talented than anyone at the Triple A level.

Rasmus had a breakout season in Double A and struggled as a 21-year-old in Triple A. That's akin to what happened to Wil Myers as a 20-year-old in Double A this year.

Compare their numbers at those levels at those ages:

Rasmus: .251/.346/.396 in 387 PA

Myers: .254/.353/.393 in 416 PA

So does that mean that Myers has lost skill or was it merely an adjustment to a new level at a very young age? I'll grant you that Rasmus didn't have a great rookie season, but he didn't have a bad year either...very similar to Moose's line this year. Then, in his second season, Rasmus blew up. He was having a good year last year amidst the drama of LaRussa then injured his wrist.

I see him as a player with a lot of upside still, as a former first round pick, top five prospect (twice) and someone who could be a worthy risk....if - IF - the price is right. I doubt the Royals do anything.

Kevin Scobee 11 pts

michael.allen.engel also, an average CF (which Rasmus probably is right now, all around) is far more important than maybe even a great "closer".

jim fetterolf 16 pts

michael.allen.engelGage Matthewseric.akers Myers may be a better comparison. I admit that I haven't completely bought into Myers. If he lights up Springdale, then hits as well as Cain did in Omaha, then I'll jump on the bandwagon.As for Moose comparisons, bear in mind that I'm more interested in trends than in average or aggregate statistics. Moose started weak, finished strong, a pattern throughout his career, and did that the year following a dominant season in AAA and dominance in AA. Moose is precisely on expected track and it is a reasonable expectation that he can continue productively just based on his ability to adjust.I also doubt the Royals do anything with Rasmus, as he doesn't address a need. If Soria is moved, it will be as part of a deal for an SP. Good discussion, appreciate the efforts of all the posters.

michael.allen.engel 32 pts moderator

jim fetterolfGage Matthewseric.akers All of this is speculation. It makes sense to see Soria as the key trade chip, but I haven't seen one report, whisper or anything about any names being discussed. It's all speculation. Worth discussing, but I think a LOT of people are taking off as if these names have already been exchanged and it's a matter of getting the final details...it's not. One sentence from a Toronto beat reporter and one signing of an injury-embattled former closer has blown up into suddenly we have Colby Rasmus...

Anyway, as for Gordon, wouldn't it be fair to suggest that his one successful season, given the rest of his career in the majors, is an aberration too? He's 27 and only now has had strong production as a big leaguer. I'm glad to have him but he's far from a proven commodity. Neither is Rasmus. But at 25, as a former top five prospect (twice) in all of the minor leagues and as the Cards top prospect for three years...that's a lot of people being wrong on him for a long time.

All that being said, I don't think we're gonna know the market value for Soria or Rasmus until either are traded.

jim fetterolf 16 pts

michael.allen.engelGage Matthewseric.akers Looked up Gordon and his three reasonably complete seasons; 2007, '08, and '11 showed a wOBA progression from .317 to .344 to .382. In '09 he had 49 games, '10 74. I like Gordo's trend line, just as I like Moose's. Rasmus' wOBA trend is .311, .366, .302. Rasmus may have potential and I wouldn't mind him if he came real cheap and went to Omaha to back Cain up, but we do have Prades and Orlando moving up and they will need space. He may be great one day, he may be Bob Hamelin. Not sure the potential is worth Soria.

michael.allen.engel 32 pts moderator

jim fetterolfGage Matthewseric.akers Good points, though if the Royals are trading for Rasmus, there's 0% chance he's in Omaha or backing anyone up, especially if it takes Soria to get him. You're either going to be glad we don't get him or very disappointed that we do :)

Dunno that Orlando is ever gonna stick in the big leagues. I like the potential and he's shown flashes but there's zero buzz about him. He's 26 and hasn't really sniffed the big leagues. I do like Prades, but he's a ways off yet.

I still don't think we make a move anyway. Until I see more smoke, I'm not convinced there's a move in the works.

jim fetterolf 16 pts

michael.allen.engelGage Matthewseric.akers This may be a Toronto writer's revenge on us for cutting Davies, whom the Jays signed to a minor league contract:)

Trackbacks

  1. [...] by Michael Engel LIVE Royalman Report – 7 p.m. CST Sunday with guest Joel Goldberg | (0) Royals Sign Jonathan Broxton | (19) Franchise Mode | (15) More Thoughts On Jonathan Sanchez | (8) Detroit May Be Hearing [...]