Deciphering Peter Gammons


On Saturday afternoon, Peter Gammons tweeted something that hasn’t been entirely clear in its meaning.

Here’s the tweet:

Agent:”3 years Buck, Benoit. Pirates, Royals offering big. This is a great market. Angels, Red Sox, Mets could be left behind”

To break it down, the comment from this agent has its obvious elements – Joaquin Benoit and John Buck just signed three year contracts.  The confusing part is where this agent seems to think the Royals and Pirates will shut out the Angels, Red Sox and Mets.

Huh?

Maybe I’ve missed an article that explains the quote, but otherwise, that doesn’t seem to make sense. The Royals and Pirates outbidding, well, anybody just seems improbable for any major free agents.

Some have speculated that this refers specifically to Jorge de la Rosa, who’s been mentioned as a target of both the Royals and Pirates. That could certainly be the case, though de la Rosa’s agent is Bobby Barad, while the Buck and Benoit deals were negotiated by the Levinson Brothers of ACES Agency Inc., so their mention in the tweet may be circumstantial.

It would follow then that perhaps the tweet doesn’t hint at de la Rosa at all, and may pertain to other ACES free agents. Other notable free agents represented by ACES are Grant Balfour, Randy Choate, Javier Vazquez, Aaron Harang, Melky Cabrera and Eric Hinske. As a Royals fan, I don’t see the Royals as targeting any of those (or that’s maybe wishful thinking because I don’t want Cabrera anywhere near this team). I also don’t see much of a bidding war for most of those players, though Vazquez will draw interest. Just not from Pittsburgh or Kansas City.

I’ve also wondered if it refers to draft strategies, since both the Royals and Pirates are among the seven teams who have surpassed $20 million in signing bonuses among their top five bonus contracts. The problem with that is that the other teams are those clubs who have usually had top ten picks, so of course their bonuses will be higher at those draft slots. No, that can’t be it, mostly because what would it have to do with the current free agent market?

Are the Royals involved in unknown negotiations for Jayson Werth or Cliff Lee? The current standing and short-term potential of the Royals would likely shut out any big name free agent signings unless they were willing to shell out an extra year or two of guaranteed money and a higher salary as well. Neither the Royals nor the Pirates seem willing to do anything like that, instead waiting for their rich farm systems to develop. It’s also unlikely the Red Sox or Mets couldn’t win over a free agent based on their market and merchandising possibilities.

So I’m stumped. Maybe it refers to offering veterans in trade offers, like a “big offer” of Zack Greinke. But how that pertains to the other teams, I don’t know. It seems like the Red Sox would be a team that may be in the market for Zack Greinke, so I don’t know how they’d be left behind. The only “big” trade chip the Pirates might have would be Ryan Doumit or maybe Garrett Jones, but I wouldn’t classify either of them as significant trade targets.

Considering that a recent Gammons article on MLB.com proposes that the Royals are aiming to maintain their draft and international signing budgets by keeping payroll around $60 million, there’s no real link between the agent’s quote and the state of the Royals (and Pirates).

While I’d find it interesting to visit MLBTradeRumors.com tomorrow and see that the Royals have signed Jayson Werth to a five year contract, or that Carl Crawford suddenly wants to be a Royal, the likelihood of either scenario is pretty slim. Sadly, as fun as that would be, I think this is more agent-speak than anything (though why Gammons passed it on, I don’t know). Maybe it’s an attempt to plant the seed that if the Royals and Pirates are willing to spend big, then the Red Sox, Mets and Angels are going to have to make their strongest deals to stay ahead and get their coveted targets.

It’s a bizarre tweet, but then, if you follow Gammons, his messages are often a bit cryptic. Maybe that’s the curse of the 140-character format. The limits of the medium. Whatever the case, maybe it’s something significant and we’ll discover Jayson Werth (and his awesome beard) playing right field next year and beyond.

Hey, it could happen.

You can stay current on all the Kings of Kauffman content and news by following us on Twitter, Facebook, or by way of our RSS feed.

Next Royals Game View full schedule »
Saturday, Aug 2323 Aug7:05at Texas RangersBuy Tickets

Tags: AL Central Baseball Jayson Werth Joaquin Benoit John Buck Kansas City Royals KC MLB Peter Gammons Peter Gammons Tweet Pittsburgh Pirates Royals Zack Greinke

  • Pingback: Deciphering Peter Gammons | Kings of Kauffman | A Kansas City … | Kansas City Royals Blog

  • http://motorcitybengals.com John Parent

    I read that tweet when he posted it. My thought was that he was saying that the Royals and Pirates were being aggressive with contract years (much like aggressive offers that landed Buck and Benoit), not money. Big market teams he mentioned are not offering the years that smaller market clubs are offering right now and therefore, could wind up missing out on bigger name talent to longer offers from other clubs.

    Maybe I’m reading far too much into that, but that’s how I took it. Of course, Gammons has also tweeted gems like “Wok bm pppppppppppppppppppppppppp” and “Plops”. Those are complete tweets. I found myself giggling every time I even think about the second one.

    • http://kingsofkauffman.com Michael Engel

      Yeah, the contract year thought makes sense because it’s one of the ways a small market team can keep up with the big markets, in the same kind of neighborhood as signing high-bonus players who drop due to signability concerns.

      But there’s also the possibility Gammons likes to goof off on Twitter. For a great sportswriter, he’s pretty much rambling 90% of the time on Twitter.