<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royals interested in Jarrod Washburn?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kingsofkauffman.com/2010/03/30/royals-interested-in-jarrod-washburn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2010/03/30/royals-interested-in-jarrod-washburn/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Royals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 02:29:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary west</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2010/03/30/royals-interested-in-jarrod-washburn/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>gary west</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 18:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=4054#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>i agree with Nick.  You must be joking to rather see Farnsworth than Washburn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with Nick.  You must be joking to rather see Farnsworth than Washburn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Laundry</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2010/03/30/royals-interested-in-jarrod-washburn/#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>The Laundry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=4054#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>Washburn belongs back in Seattle, where they have a pitcher&#039;s park and very sound defense (especially without Yuni now).  This is not a win now situation, and the Royals should focus on finding who, if any, among Bannister, Davies, Hochevar and Tejeda can cut it in the rotation going forward.  

I wouldn&#039;t completely hate this deal if unnecessary money and years weren&#039;t already committed to so many at or below replacement level players (Guillen, Farnsworth, Betancourt, Kendall, Podsednik, Bloomquist).  But even then it would not make much sense.  Washburn&#039;s been throwing junk for years. Power arms or elite breaking stuff are what will help the Royals, and Washburn has neither.

BTW What a sad list that is above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washburn belongs back in Seattle, where they have a pitcher&#8217;s park and very sound defense (especially without Yuni now).  This is not a win now situation, and the Royals should focus on finding who, if any, among Bannister, Davies, Hochevar and Tejeda can cut it in the rotation going forward.  </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t completely hate this deal if unnecessary money and years weren&#8217;t already committed to so many at or below replacement level players (Guillen, Farnsworth, Betancourt, Kendall, Podsednik, Bloomquist).  But even then it would not make much sense.  Washburn&#8217;s been throwing junk for years. Power arms or elite breaking stuff are what will help the Royals, and Washburn has neither.</p>
<p>BTW What a sad list that is above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2010/03/30/royals-interested-in-jarrod-washburn/#comment-2141</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=4054#comment-2141</guid>
		<description>Id rather see Washburn 15 times this year than Farnsworth once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Id rather see Washburn 15 times this year than Farnsworth once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Engel</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2010/03/30/royals-interested-in-jarrod-washburn/#comment-2139</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Engel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=4054#comment-2139</guid>
		<description>This kind of reminds me of the quote &quot;only losing teams have inning eaters&quot;. 
In a vacuum and on paper, I&#039;d like Washburn as a part of this team, but, as you noted, his presence doesn&#039;t do anything but take starts away from Davies/Hochevar/Bannister - all three of whom still have things to prove and work on both for this year, next year and potentially down the line when the Lamb/Dwyer/Montgomery/Runion/Arguelles/etc crew starts moving up the ladder.

On an unrelated note, being able to type out a decent sized list of potential starting talent off the cuff is light years beyond where Kansas City was as an organization even two years ago.  And I even omitted a few, so let&#039;s add Crow/Melville/Sample to that list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of reminds me of the quote &#8220;only losing teams have inning eaters&#8221;.<br />
In a vacuum and on paper, I&#8217;d like Washburn as a part of this team, but, as you noted, his presence doesn&#8217;t do anything but take starts away from Davies/Hochevar/Bannister &#8211; all three of whom still have things to prove and work on both for this year, next year and potentially down the line when the Lamb/Dwyer/Montgomery/Runion/Arguelles/etc crew starts moving up the ladder.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, being able to type out a decent sized list of potential starting talent off the cuff is light years beyond where Kansas City was as an organization even two years ago.  And I even omitted a few, so let&#8217;s add Crow/Melville/Sample to that list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Royals interested in Jarrod Washburn? &#124; Kings of Kauffman &#124; A Kansas City Royals Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2010/03/30/royals-interested-in-jarrod-washburn/#comment-2138</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Royals interested in Jarrod Washburn? &#124; Kings of Kauffman &#124; A Kansas City Royals Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=4054#comment-2138</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Wally Fish, royalsfeed. royalsfeed said: Royals interested in Jarrod Washburn?: According to John Heyman the Royals have reinserted themselves, he uses the... http://bit.ly/aHqDwR [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Wally Fish, royalsfeed. royalsfeed said: Royals interested in Jarrod Washburn?: According to John Heyman the Royals have reinserted themselves, he uses the&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/aHqDwR" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aHqDwR</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 26/30 queries in 0.078 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 326/357 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: kingsofkauffman.com @ 2013-06-17 23:32:55 by W3 Total Cache -->