<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Teahen for Chris Getz and Josh Fields Reaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/11/05/mark-teahen-for-chris-getz-and-josh-fields-reaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/11/05/mark-teahen-for-chris-getz-and-josh-fields-reaction/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Royals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:11:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday Morning Reading &#124; The Rat Trick &#124; A Florida Panthers Blog</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/11/05/mark-teahen-for-chris-getz-and-josh-fields-reaction/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Morning Reading &#124; The Rat Trick &#124; A Florida Panthers Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=2086#comment-395</guid>
		<description>[...] Fish over at Kings of Kaufmann has a say about the Mark Teahen trade to the White [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fish over at Kings of Kaufmann has a say about the Mark Teahen trade to the White [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott W</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/11/05/mark-teahen-for-chris-getz-and-josh-fields-reaction/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=2086#comment-390</guid>
		<description>By the way, &quot;ho-hum&quot; is my reaction to the trade, not the article.  Excellent piece!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, &#8220;ho-hum&#8221; is my reaction to the trade, not the article.  Excellent piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott W</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/11/05/mark-teahen-for-chris-getz-and-josh-fields-reaction/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=2086#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Ho-hum.

I don&#039;t feel like the Royals are any better after this trade.  But it&#039;s true you can&#039;t keep marching the same guys out there &amp; expect a much different result.  For a team like the Royals, change for change&#039;s sake is a positive.  Hopefully we can soon get to the point where we&#039;re doing change for IMPROVEMENT&#039;S sake, not just change&#039;s sake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ho-hum.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel like the Royals are any better after this trade.  But it&#8217;s true you can&#8217;t keep marching the same guys out there &amp; expect a much different result.  For a team like the Royals, change for change&#8217;s sake is a positive.  Hopefully we can soon get to the point where we&#8217;re doing change for IMPROVEMENT&#8217;S sake, not just change&#8217;s sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

