<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overvaluing My Core?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/07/03/overvaluing-my-core/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/07/03/overvaluing-my-core/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Royals Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:20:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Late Night Royals Links</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/07/03/overvaluing-my-core/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Late Night Royals Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=805#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] Overvaluing My Core? &#124; Kings of Kauffman &#124; A Kansas City Royals Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Overvaluing My Core? | Kings of Kauffman | A Kansas City Royals Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally Fish</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/07/03/overvaluing-my-core/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally Fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=805#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we are that far apart on Teahen.  My only other thought on that matter is that a DeRosa type return would be of little use to the Royals where they are at now.  Now if Chris Perez were turned into a young position player like a SS or C with upside then I&#039;d be more inclined to listen, but I&#039;d still lean toward hanging on to MT.

Sounds like we are standing on common ground with respect to Hochevar.

With regard to the Soria matter, I see your point about the injury concern.  However, any concerns the Royals may have about Soria&#039;s shoulder are going to be matched by any team looking to acquire him.  That, in turn, is going to reduce his potential trade return.  Soria is a stud in the majors and he just turned 25, actually 2 months younger than Kila Ka&#039;aihue.  Relievers are relievers, we definitely agree there, but from my perspective elite closers are in a completely different class.

We are in complete agreement about what Dayton Moore will likely end up doing.  My feelings on that are precisely why I wrote both articles based on what I would do as the GM.  That said, if he simply manages to unload Jose Guillen&#039;s contract for a bag of baseballs before the deadline, I will be pretty happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we are that far apart on Teahen.  My only other thought on that matter is that a DeRosa type return would be of little use to the Royals where they are at now.  Now if Chris Perez were turned into a young position player like a SS or C with upside then I&#8217;d be more inclined to listen, but I&#8217;d still lean toward hanging on to MT.</p>
<p>Sounds like we are standing on common ground with respect to Hochevar.</p>
<p>With regard to the Soria matter, I see your point about the injury concern.  However, any concerns the Royals may have about Soria&#8217;s shoulder are going to be matched by any team looking to acquire him.  That, in turn, is going to reduce his potential trade return.  Soria is a stud in the majors and he just turned 25, actually 2 months younger than Kila Ka&#8217;aihue.  Relievers are relievers, we definitely agree there, but from my perspective elite closers are in a completely different class.</p>
<p>We are in complete agreement about what Dayton Moore will likely end up doing.  My feelings on that are precisely why I wrote both articles based on what I would do as the GM.  That said, if he simply manages to unload Jose Guillen&#8217;s contract for a bag of baseballs before the deadline, I will be pretty happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaeljong</title>
		<link>http://kingsofkauffman.com/2009/07/03/overvaluing-my-core/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>michaeljong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofkauffman.com/?p=805#comment-82</guid>
		<description>In the sense that you likely wouldn&#039;t receive enough talent, I&#039;d say that&#039;s fair. I agree that Teahen would probably net a DeRosa like return, but I think that would be good for Teahen. You say he plays many positions, but it&#039;s fair to say he only plays the corner outfield decently and is below average at third base. We won&#039;t even get into his second base play, which from all accounts I heard was bad in Spring Training.

Hochevar has little value outside of the team, but as 3rd-4th starter, he isn&#039;t bad. In addition, he might have the off-chance to develop into a 2nd, and if he doesn&#039;t pan out, it seems like the bullpen isn&#039;t a bad option. There&#039;s a lot to go around with Hochevar, but I&#039;d say he&#039;s &quot;untouchable&quot; in that offering him in a trade wouldn&#039;t be worth it to the team.

Soria I tend to disagree with. I&#039;m of the opinion that relievers are relievers and there are many of them out there. He&#039;s already shown some injury concern, and counting on him to stick around and stay healthy and productive may be a risk. He&#039;s young and in club control, so that makes him easier to keep and to get good return in a deal. Two A-guys would be a lot (my opinion of an A guy is someone like SF&#039;s Madison Baumgarner, a top-flight prospect), but two guys along the lines Kihuahue (excuse my spelling, not a Royals fan, just an observer) might be enough in my opinion.

Alas, I think Dayton Moore won&#039;t be doing any of these things, so it may be a moot point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the sense that you likely wouldn&#8217;t receive enough talent, I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s fair. I agree that Teahen would probably net a DeRosa like return, but I think that would be good for Teahen. You say he plays many positions, but it&#8217;s fair to say he only plays the corner outfield decently and is below average at third base. We won&#8217;t even get into his second base play, which from all accounts I heard was bad in Spring Training.</p>
<p>Hochevar has little value outside of the team, but as 3rd-4th starter, he isn&#8217;t bad. In addition, he might have the off-chance to develop into a 2nd, and if he doesn&#8217;t pan out, it seems like the bullpen isn&#8217;t a bad option. There&#8217;s a lot to go around with Hochevar, but I&#8217;d say he&#8217;s &#8220;untouchable&#8221; in that offering him in a trade wouldn&#8217;t be worth it to the team.</p>
<p>Soria I tend to disagree with. I&#8217;m of the opinion that relievers are relievers and there are many of them out there. He&#8217;s already shown some injury concern, and counting on him to stick around and stay healthy and productive may be a risk. He&#8217;s young and in club control, so that makes him easier to keep and to get good return in a deal. Two A-guys would be a lot (my opinion of an A guy is someone like SF&#8217;s Madison Baumgarner, a top-flight prospect), but two guys along the lines Kihuahue (excuse my spelling, not a Royals fan, just an observer) might be enough in my opinion.</p>
<p>Alas, I think Dayton Moore won&#8217;t be doing any of these things, so it may be a moot point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
